Table 1 - 2013 Q-Q results |
Table 1, shows a net profit increase from RM8.542 million to RM19.659 million, a improvement of 130%. It looks like our forecast were right. However, looking deeper into the quarter reports shows otherwise.
Table 2- 2013 Q-Q segment profit |
Why did the bulk carrier made further losses while the Baltik Dry index showed a 40% rise in Q4? Is the index a poor indicator to Maybulk?
Chart 1 - BDI vs Revenue from Bulk segment |
Chart 2 compares the reported TCE (time charter equivalent) to BDI index for the same period. it is also positively correlates. (TCE is a standard average to gauge a profitability of vessels. Multiplying TCE to the number of Hire days is the Bulk revenue.)
The BDI index is actually a composite of 4 independent indexes namely the Capsize, Panamax, handysize and Suprasize index. These are index for rates of different size ships. The Capesize are the largest and Maybulk do not have one. Chart 3 compares the TCE with the new BDI index with capsize numbers excluded. The correlation is even more obvious.
The above charts shows, the BDI and BDI without Capsize remain a good indicator to the profitability of Maybulk. For the recent Q4 quarter, the variation might be due to Dry Docking as well as lagging effect seen in chart 1.
What is in store for the coming future?
Chart 4 - maybulk share price vs BDI exclude Capsize |
from Chart 4, month on month, Maybulk's share price is also in tandem with BDI exclude Capsize index. However, recent 2 months (2014 Jan & Feb) it is diverging from the index. For a short period, this does occurs. Over timer, it is expected, the price to normalize or the index recovers. With news flow for the listing of POSH emerging, prices are expected to be driven up. But it is to remember, the listing of POSH is a one of event. Ultimately, the BDI rates is going to dictate Maybulk's future.
No comments:
Post a Comment